Huge Win! Two More Brands to Go Fur-Free 

There is no doubt that fur still has a place in fashion, but the future of skin for brands looks uncertain. As public opinion shifts, we may see more brands ditching hair in favor of more humane materials. Here are a few of the most reputed brands committed to going fur-free.

One of the most high-profile luxury brands to go fur-free is Gucci. The brand announced its decision in October 2017, stating that it would no longer use fur in any of its collections, starting with those shown for Spring/Summer 2018. Gucci was quickly followed by several other major fashion houses, including Versace, Michael Kors, and Burberry.

More affordable brands have also been making the switch to fur-free alternatives.

Fur has been a popular material in fashion for centuries. It is luxurious and often seen as a status symbol. Recently, however, there has been a shift in public opinion about fur. Many people now avoid wearing fur due to the cruelty of obtaining it. Animals are often kept in cramped, dirty conditions and in brutal ways to get their fur. Due to public backlash, numerous designers and stores have ceased using fur in their products. Several businesses have vowed never to use fur in their creations.

Despite this backlash, some people still believe that fur is an acceptable material to use in fashion. They argue that animals are killed for different reasons, such as food and leather goods, so why should fur be different?

What does it mean for the future of fur?

Several brands have decided to go fur-free to be more environmentally friendly. Some of the most well-known companies that have vowed to do this include the following:

1. H&M: One of the world’s largest fashion retailers, H&M has committed to being fur-free starting in 2018. The company has already stopped using angora and mohair in its products.

2. Gucci: One of the most well-known luxury brands, Gucci announced it would go fur-free starting with its 2018 collection.

3. Stella McCartney: A long-time opponent of fur, Stella McCartney has never used it in her designs. The brand is also vegan and uses sustainable materials whenever possible.

The impact of these decisions

In recent years, many fashion brands have decided to go fur-free. This has significantly impacted the fur industry, which has experienced declining sales and production.

The reasons for this shift are varied but include animal welfare concerns and the increasing availability of alternative materials. For many brands, going fur-free appeals to a younger, more socially conscious consumer base.

After years of public outcry and pressure from animal rights groups, many fashion brands have finally gone fur-free. This is a significant victory for animals, as the fur industry is one of the cruelest industries in the world. Here are the key benefits of brands going fur-free:

1. Animals will suffer less.

In the fur industry, animals often face horrific conditions. They are usually kept in tiny cages, where they can barely move, and sometimes even die inside. By going fur-free, brands can help put an end to this cruelty.

2. It’s better for the environment.

Fur production is very harmful to the environment, as it requires large amounts of water and energy to produce just a small amount of fur. Plus, the chemicals used in fur farming can pollute nearby waterways. Raising and killing animals for their skin is very resource intensive. It requires a lot of land, water, and energy, which strains our planet.

3. Improved public image:

Many people now see the use of fur as needless and cruel, and there has been a growing pushback against it in recent years. As a result, brands that continue to use fur often face negative publicity. By going fur-free, brands can improve their public image and avoid this bad press.

4. It’s better for workers.

Many workers in the fur industry are in touch with dangerous chemicals and working conditions. Going fur-free is a way to help improve these workers’ lives.

5. It’s more sustainable.

The impact of brands going fur-free has been far-reaching and has contributed to an overall decline in the demand for fur. Given that more companies are switching to alternative materials, this will probably continue in the future. Fur is not an environmentally friendly material because it is not a renewable resource.

Animals one step closer to freedom

As the world progresses, so does the way we treat animals. Brands are now starting to go fur-free to promote the more humane treatment of animals. This is a step in the right direction for animal rights activists who have been fighting for years to end the use of fur. The move away from fur is also good for the environment. Fur production requires a lot of energy and resources. It’s estimated that it takes 15 times more energy to produce a coat from animal fur than to make a fake fur coat. Faux fur coats are also cheaper to grow, making them more affordable for consumers.

Brands have been using fur in clothing and other products for centuries. However, with the advancement of technology, many synthetic materials can now be used instead of fur. These synthetic materials are often cheaper and easier to obtain than fur. The trend toward fur-free fashion is a positive one that’s good for animals and the environment.

Many people believe that wearing fur is cruel and unnecessary. Animals used for their fur are often kept in small cages and not given proper care or attention. They may also be subject to painful procedures, such as cutting their tails or ears off.